The Road to Retirement Security

CORPaTH Works Toward a Brighter Future for Workers

CORPaTH is an alliance of financial experts, pension fund trustees, Union leaders and other professionals dedicated to rescuing the dream of a secure retirement for working people.

In just a few years, the annual CORPaTH Summit has emerged as the premier forum for analyzing the nature and causes of the worldwide pension crisis and providing workable solutions.

The problem takes many forms, but the issue affecting most Americans is their employers’ abandonment of traditional defined-benefit pensions in favor of defined-contribution plans like 401(k)s.
Here’s the difference: Defined-benefit pensions like the ones enjoyed by most Union members provide guarantees of a steady income during retirement. Defined-contribution plans, on the other hand, are funded primarily by employees and provide no guarantees at all.

In a 401(k) plan, an employee is expected to put money aside every month into a special fund which is invested in the stock market or other money-making ventures to build up equity over the years. If all goes well, the worker has gathered a nice nest egg by the time he or she retires.

The problem is things rarely work out the right way. The average worker has no idea how to properly manage funds in an investment portfolio and doesn’t have the means to endure severe downturns like the one we experienced in the Great Recession of a few years ago.

Furthermore, most workers have to deal with such competing priorities as financing a child’s wedding or college education. Confronted with few options,  any choose to borrow from their retirement funds.
Because of these factors and more — such as high investment fees and longer life spans — we are heading for a catastrophe of huge proportions.

Boston College’s Center for Retirement Research finds 52 percent of U.S. households are at risk of running low on money during retirement, up from 31 percent of households in 1983.

Approximately 45 percent of all households currently have NOTHING saved for retirement, according to the National Institute on Retirement Security.

In his outstanding recent article in the Wall Street Journal, Timothy W. Martin reports how even the creators of the 401(k) plan are saying they regret the suffering their creation has caused.

“I helped open the door for Wall Street to make even more money than they were already making,” said Ted Benna, who first formulated the idea in 1980.

“That is one thing I do regret,” he told Martin.

“We weren’t social visionaries,” said Herbert Whitehouse, another innovator of the 401(k).

Damage has been done, but regrets aren’t enough to repair it. This is why CORPaTH exists.

CORPaTH is developing strategies to strengthen traditional defined-benefit pensions and reverse the trend in which employers have been pushing their workers onto 401(k) plans.

To this end, the organization is a proud supporter of the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment. These principles encourage transparency and accountability by corporations toward their investors, which include pension funds administered jointly by Unions and their affiliated employers.

CORPaTH also advocates letting these pension funds use criteria for investment which take their own interests in account. For example, a Union fund shouldn’t be forced to invest in anti-Union companies.

Recently, we were pleased to learn Tom Perez, the outgoing secretary of Labor under former President Obama, has listened to us and issued new rules to improve corporate accountability to investors.

We have a long road ahead, but through coalitions like CORPaTH, we can make real progress toward achieving retirement security for millions of working people who deserve it.

Irrational Hyperbole and Contempt vs. Reason and Respect

Regardless of your political persuasion, there has been no shortage of ironic hypocrisy, hostility, cynical sniping, sarcastic smugness, labeling, hate speak and irrational hyperbole over the last several months leading up to the presidential election.
 
Comedians and political pundits have made careers out of it and we all have friends and family who are terrific at slicing and dicing the politics of today.

Sometimes it feels good to be snarky in your observations of those you have differences of opinion and it can surely feel more safe to remain insulated in your world-view bubble.

It isn’t likely this type of behavior is going to end any time soon. After all, it is a traditional aspect of free speech in our country.

That being said, the toxicity has reached dangerous levels that do not suggest anything but more bitter differences for the near future, and that is troubling as we wrestle with finding our way toward a future we can all be proud of in this great country.

Keeping an open mind with people who seem closed to your views is extremely difficult to do and treating others with respect while they hold your views or even you in contempt requires superhuman patience and tolerance. Nonetheless, this is what we need to strive for if we are going to find a path to civility and productivity. The recent presidential campaign did more than expose an already existing divide between two Americas occupying the same land. It drove a wedge into our common ground, separating parents from children, wives from husbands, rural folk from urban folk, people who have college degrees and people who don’t.

Era of toxic rhetoric

In the 1960s, the generations were split by diverging opinions concerning the war in Vietnam, civil rights, popular music and other issues of a society in transformation. But we’d have to go back to the 1860s to find an era when the rhetoric was so pervasively toxic.

Abraham Lincoln saw the storm gathering as he delivered his first inaugural address in January 1861. Even as the newly formed Confederate States of America gathered its troops, the new president pleaded for restraint in word, thought and deed:

“We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.”

It is tragic that his words fell on deaf ears. Within three months, Americans marched to war against each other. More than 620,000 Americans died in the Civil War and more than a million were injured before it ended.

No one expects the social divisions of our day will lead to massive death and destruction on this scale. But I’m not alone in thinking the fabric of American society has been torn in ways that won’t be easy to mend.

Nevertheless, we must try.

We can begin by reminding ourselves we are all sisters and brothers of the American republic. Wherever we come from, whenever we got here, whatever we believe, we share a common history of devotion to a common ideal of a nation dedicated to the proposition that all people are created equal and our government is created by the people and for the people.

Mother Teresa, now known as Saint Teresa, wasn’t an American, but she knew the score when she said: “If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other.”

As Union members and Americans, we must never forget we belong to each other. We must always try to reach into our own hearts and find the “better angels of our nature.”

We can disagree strongly with others’ opinions, but we must never, ever treat each other with contempt. We must pull back from words of hate and choose instead the words of love.

I would like to end this column by wishing you and your loved ones a happy holiday season and a new year filled with joy and brotherhood (and sisterhood). Thank you for all of your work in making our Union stronger, and thank you for proving to the world, time and time again…

Solidarity Works!